Our Resources

360 Feedback Rating Scales

The rating scale used should be driven by the overall purpose of the questionnaire, in particular, whether it is being used as part of an appraisal/performance evaluation process or to provide developmental feedback and insight.

360 degree feedback rating scales can broadly be grouped into three categories:


1. Judgemental Scales

These ask the feedback respondent to grade, appraise, score, or pass judgement on the participant. They are most often used when the questionnaire is linked to performance measurement.

Examples include:

  • Competence / Development Scale: “How would you rate this person’s competence or development in this area?” (Outstanding strength → Needs significant development)
  • Comparison Scale: “Compared to other managers within the organisation, this person is…” (Far above average → Far below average)
  • Performance Scale: “How would you rate their performance in this area?” (Exceeded expectations → Did not meet expectations)
  • Satisfaction Scale: “How satisfied are you with this person’s performance of…?” (Very satisfied → Very dissatisfied)
Judgemental Scales


2. Observation (Frequency) Scales

These are the most commonly used when the purpose of the questionnaire is to provide developmental feedback. They ask respondents to indicate how often or to what extent they see the participant demonstrating certain behaviours.

The data is used to raise the participant’s awareness of how they are seen and perceived by others.

Typical response options include:

Observation (Frequency) Scales


3. Agreement Scales

These ask respondents to indicate how much they agree or disagree with a particular statement (e.g. Strongly agree → Strongly disagree).

While widely used in psychometric questionnaires and organisational surveys to measure attitudes and perceptions, we do not recommend them for 360 feedback. They tend to capture opinions rather than observable behaviours, which can reduce the quality of the feedback.

Agreement Scales

360 Feedback Rating Scale Points

There has been extensive research into the optimal number of points on a scale and how best to present them. The following combines generic best practice with our experience of designing 360 feedback questionnaires.

Three-Point Scales: While three-point scales may appear quicker and easier for respondents, they:


Five to Seven Point Scales: Increasing the number of points improves reliability, with the greatest gains occurring between three and five points.

In practice, we have found that five points of difference on a frequency scale provide the best balance:


Labelling Scale Points: Adding descriptors or response labels to each point improves consistency of understanding, which leads to greater reliability. For example, “Almost always” is clearer than simply using numbers.

Labelling Scale Points

Equal Points of Separation: Each step on the scale should represent an equal increment. Uneven spacing between options leads to confusion and reduces data accuracy.

A poor example of unequal spacing:

Equal Points of Separation

In this example, “Poor” is positioned too far away from the other options, making the scale misleading and inconsistent.


Use One Consistent Scale: Finally, for ease of completion and cleaner data analysis, it is good practice to use a single scale throughout the questionnaire Frequently Asked Questions about 360 Feedback Rating Scales wherever possible.


Top tip

To get it right - Use a frequency type scale with between 5 – 7 points on it, each with a label that is clearly differentiated from those either side of it


Frequently Asked Questions about 360 Feedback Rating Scales

Q. What is the best rating scale to use in 360-degree feedback?

A. A 5-point observation (frequency) scale is best for 360 feedback, as it measures how often behaviours are seen and provides clear, reliable, and actionable insights.


Q. How many points should a 360 feedback rating scale have?

A. A 5-point frequency scale is ideal for 360 feedback, offering the best balance between detail and usability. It produces reliable, consistent, and actionable results. Avoid 3-point scales, which restrict responses and lead to less useful data. Always label each point clearly for better accuracy.



More from '360 Questionnaire Design':
More from '360 Questionnaire Design':

360 Feedback Questionnaire Design – Best Practice Guide... provides proven best practice for designing effective 360 feedback questionnaires.



Six Principles for Designing a 360 Feedback Questionnaire... explores six must-dos for designing a 360 feedback questionnaire, providing practical guidance to create clear, focused, and actionable feedback that supports meaningful development

Eight Common Mistakes to Avoid When Writing 360 Feedback Questions... designing clear, reliable 360 feedback questions is crucial. This article highlights eight common mistakes to avoid and offers practical tips to improve question quality.

How to Write Great 360 Degree Feedback Questions: A Complete Guide... a complete guide to writing great 360 feedback questions with practical principles, common pitfalls to avoid, and a simple checklist for better design.


View more