We all recognise the importance of giving balanced 360 feedback, celebrating what has gone well while also exploring opportunities for growth. Yet achieving that balance in written comments is often difficult. Positive points are easily overshadowed by what follows, and so-called “negative” aspects, however carefully phrased, can still come across as criticism. Words like developmental, constructive, or critical often sound harsh and judgemental, even when the intention is to help. People are also more sensitive to criticism than praise, a negativity bias that means negative comments linger far longer people’s in memory. The familiar “feedback sandwich” (praise, criticism, praise) is often seen as formulaic and insincere, especially in written feedback where tone is harder to interpret. And because many people worry about how their words will be received or fear damaging relationships, they soften or avoid honest feedback altogether. As a result, comments intended to support development can end up vague, diluted, or too cautious to have real impact.
This is where the WWW and EBI framework offers a powerful alternative approach. It helps you write 360 feedback comments that feel balanced, constructive and useful. Instead of focusing only on what needs to change, it encourages you to recognise strengths first and then explore how things could be improved without blame or negativity. It also has the following advantages:
When completing a 360 feedback questionnaire, writing comments that are both constructive and actionable can be challenging. The examples below show how to structure feedback using the WWW (What Went Well) and EBI (Even Better If) approach. Each one illustrates how to provide clear, balanced comments on 360 feedback strengths and weaknesses — the kind of feedback that supports meaningful development and is highly valued in 360 reports.
Example 1: Generating ideas
Example 2: Communication style
Example 3: Leadership approach
These examples show how small changes in phrasing can make feedback more balanced and useful. By clearly identifying strengths and pairing them with specific suggestions for improvement, you create 360 feedback strengths and weaknesses comments that are more likely to be heard, understood and acted upon.
Ultimately, delivering balanced 360 feedback on strengths and weaknesses is about more than simply being polite. It is about making feedback meaningful and actionable. By celebrating what is already working and framing improvements as opportunities rather than failures, the WWW and EBI approach transforms feedback from something people dread into something they value. It builds trust, encourages growth and turns feedback into a powerful driver of learning and development.
Q. How do you give constructive feedback in a 360 review?
A. Constructive feedback in a 360 review should be specific, actionable and supportive. Start by highlighting achievements and behaviours that have gone well, then suggest clear ways to improve. Using the What Went Well (WWW) and Even Better If (EBI) approach keeps feedback practical, focused and easier to act on.
Q. How do you give balanced (strengths and weaknesses) 360 feedback?
A. Balanced 360 feedback highlights both strengths and areas for growth. Recognise what the person does well, then frame development points as opportunities to build on those strengths. The WWW and EBI approach keeps comments constructive and meaningful, helping people understand how to sustain success and improve further.